- Price $20,000 USD
- Weight 30kg
- Battery Life ~4 hours
- Max Speed ~4 mph
- AI 1X Embodied Intelligence
- Sensors RGB Cameras, Depth Sensors, Tactile Skin, Microphone Array
- Connectivity Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
- Status Pre-order
- Category Humanoid
Capabilities
Comparison controls
Swap robots without losing the table. Green cells mark numeric leaders; text rows show the tradeoffs that need judgment.
Green cells flag numeric leaders, while AI, sensors, and capability rows keep the real buying tradeoffs visible.
Capabilities
Capabilities
Capabilities
Capabilities
| Spec | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $20,000 USD | N/A | N/A | $4,900 USD |
| Height | 167cm | 164cm | 5'8" (173 cm) | 123cm (standing) |
| Weight | 30kg | Not officially disclosed | 61kg | ~29kg (with battery; ~27kg for Air model) |
| Battery Life | ~4 hours | Not officially disclosed | ~5 hours | ~1 hour (mixed activity) |
| Charging Time | Not disclosed | Not officially disclosed | Not disclosed | Not officially disclosed |
| Max Speed | ~4 mph | 1 m/s | 4.3 km/h | Not officially disclosed |
| AI | 1X Embodied Intelligence | Full-stack self-developed WALL-A large operating model with tens-of-billions parameter scale for perception, reasoning, and precision manipulation | Helix VLA (in-house vision-language-action model) | 8-core CPU + GPU; optional NVIDIA Jetson Orin (40–100 TOPS, EDU only); UnifoLM multimodal LLM |
| Sensors | RGB Cameras, Depth Sensors, Tactile Skin, Microphone Array | 2D LiDAR, Ultrasonic Sensors, RGB-D Camera, 3D TOF Camera, Single-Point TOF, Infrared Sensor | Stereo Vision, Depth Cameras, Force Sensors, Tactile Arrays | Binocular Cameras, 4-Mic Array, Dual 6-Axis IMU |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | Not officially disclosed | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Ethernet | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Voice Assistants | None | None | None | UnifoLM (voice + image commands) |
| Status | Pre-order | Active | Active | Pre-order |
| Category | Humanoid | Humanoid | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Manufacturer | 1X Technologies | X Square Robot | Figure AI | Unitree Robotics |
Capability matrix
Use this grid when the shortlist is already close and feature gaps become the real tiebreaker.
| Capability | NEO | Quanta X2 | Figure 03 | R1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Degrees of Freedom (standard) | — | — | — | ✓ |
| 6-DOF Torso | — | ✓ | — | — |
| 62-DOF Whole-Body Motion | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Adaptive Learning | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Autonomous Perception and Planning | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Bipedal Walking & Running | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Cartwheels & Handstands | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Commercial Cleaning | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Complex Manipulation | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Contact-Sales Deployment | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Customizable Shell/Finish | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Dexterous Manipulation | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Gentle Manipulation | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Gesture Recognition | — | — | — | ✓ |
| High-Precision Arm Positioning | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Home-Based Service Tasks | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Household Chores | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Learning from Demonstration | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Logistics Sorting | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Manufacturing Tasks | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Multi-step Planning | — | — | ✓ | — |
| OTA Software Updates | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Optional 20-DOF Dexterous Hands | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Optional Dexterous Hands (EDU) | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Push Recovery | — | — | — | ✓ |
| ROS 2 Support | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Research and Education | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Safe Human Interaction | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Secondary Development (EDU) | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Surface Wiping and Item Organizing | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Tidying Up | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Voice & Image Interaction (UnifoLM) | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Warehouse Work | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Wheeled Humanoid Mobility | — | ✓ | — | — |
Use this flow to get to a clean shortlist fast. The route works best as a dense research workbench, not a marketing page.
Start with robots that solve the same job. Use category anchors like Humanoid, Cleaning, Companions, Commercial before you worry about micro-spec wins.
Check price, status, battery, sensors, and capabilities before getting lost in minor spec rows.
Once you have a shortlist, hide shared rows. That turns the table from a spec dump into a real decision tool.
A dedicated cleaner versus a home assistant with cleaning features can reveal whether you really need a specialist or just broader household coverage. Compare around the same outcome, not the same marketing language.
Use a prebuilt pairing when blank-page friction is the problem. Open one, swap robots, and keep moving.
Price bracket check — Roomba Mini versus AquaSense X shows what the premium tier actually buys in navigation, maintenance, and smart-home polish.
Same-brand shortlist — M1 versus Jupiter isolates whether the higher tier actually changes the ownership story.
Mobility platforms — Go2 versus D1 Pro is a fast way to compare payload, stability, and commercial ambition inside the quadruped category.
Home presence check — Miko Mini versus LOVOT reveals how much extra presence, hardware, and ecosystem you buy as companion robots move upmarket.
Turn comparison rows into an actual recommendation — not just more reading.
Not all spec deltas matter equally. Rank your buying criteria before crowning a winner.
The sticker price is only one row. Subscriptions, consumables, and service access often decide the real winner.
Subscriptions
Cloud AI and premium app tiers can make a cheaper robot more expensive over three years.
Consumables
Brushes, pads, filters, and bags flip the value story on high-frequency robots.
Energy & battery
Large batteries and frequent charging reveal everyday operating demands.
Repair & warranty
Local servicing and spare-parts access are the quietest but most important long-term costs.
Specs describe ideal conditions. Your rooms, pets, and Wi-Fi determine what actually performs.
Of 269 robots tracked, 167 are available now. For household tasks, getting a capable robot into daily use today usually beats waiting for incremental improvements. For research or early-adopter use, waiting can make sense if the next model changes the platform story.
If two robots are still neck-and-neck, use softer signals that affect ownership quality more than spec sheets admit.
Comparison FAQ
Short answers to the questions that usually show up once the shortlist is live and the tradeoffs feel real.