Compare workbench
Pick up to four robots. The best comparisons match job type, price band, or environment.
Current shortlist
Swap robots anytime. The table updates live.
ShareThe table expands across desktop, stays dense on mobile, and highlights the strongest numeric values so the real tradeoffs are easy to spot.
Capabilities
Capabilities
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,499 USD | $1,499 USD |
| Height | Not officially disclosed | 11.2" (285 mm) |
| Weight | Not officially disclosed | 22.9 lbs (10.5 kg) |
| Battery Life | Not officially disclosed | Up to 7 hours (surface cleaning), up to 5 hours (floor cleaning, ECO mode) |
| Charging Time | Not officially disclosed | Approximately 4.5 hours (65W fast charging) |
| Max Speed | Not officially disclosed | Not officially disclosed |
| AI | ZonePilot AI Vision for real-time pool mapping, debris identification, step detection, and adaptive path planning | SonicSense ultrasonic obstacle detection and avoidance, optimized S-shaped cleaning path planning, automatic zone adaptation for surface/floor/walls/waterline/platforms |
| Sensors | ZonePilot AI Vision camera, Multi-sensor fusion (obstacle and debris detection), Step detection, Underwater localization, Optional water-quality sensing | 18 integrated sensors, 2 ultrasonic sensors, SonicSense obstacle avoidance |
| Connectivity | Underwater-stable wireless link (33 ft / 10 m dock radius), App control | 5 GHz Wi-Fi, 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Beatbot app (iOS, Android, Apple Watch) |
| Voice Assistants | None | None |
| Status | Pre-order | Available |
| Category | Cleaning | Cleaning |
| Manufacturer | Mammotion | Beatbot |
Capability matrix
Use this grid when the shortlist is already close and feature gaps become the real tiebreaker.
| Capability | SPINO S1 Pro | Sora 70 |
|---|---|---|
| 6,800 GPH suction with 6L debris capacity | — | ✓ |
| 65W fast charging | — | ✓ |
| App control with remote navigation and one-tap retrieval | — | ✓ |
| App-based remote control and scheduling | ✓ | — |
| AutoShoreCharge robotic-arm docking and charging | ✓ | — |
| Cordless robotic pool cleaning | — | ✓ |
| Dual-group roller brush system (4 bottom brushes) | — | ✓ |
| Dual-layer filtration system | ✓ | — |
| Five cleaning modes (Water Surface, Floor, Pro, Standard, Eco) | — | ✓ |
| Floor, wall, waterline, edge, and corner cleaning | ✓ | — |
| Four-zone coverage: surface, walls, waterline, floor | — | ✓ |
| Fully autonomous pool cleaning with on-deck self-docking | ✓ | — |
| Horizontal waterline sweeping | ✓ | — |
| In-ground and above-ground pool support (up to ~3,300 sq ft) | ✓ | — |
| JetPulse twin-jet water surface skimming | — | ✓ |
| Optional water-quality monitoring during cleaning | ✓ | — |
| Saltwater pool support (up to 5,000 ppm) | — | ✓ |
| Shallow-platform cleaning down to 8 inches (20 cm) | — | ✓ |
| Smart Water-Surface Parking for easy retrieval | — | ✓ |
| SonicSense ultrasonic obstacle avoidance | — | ✓ |
| Underwater-stable communication for live monitoring | ✓ | — |
| Up to 8,800 GPH peak suction (5 brushless motors) | ✓ | — |
| ZonePilot AI Vision pool mapping and navigation | ✓ | — |
Use this flow to get to a clean shortlist fast. The route works best as a dense research workbench, not a marketing page.
Start with robots that solve the same job. Use category anchors like Humanoid, Cleaning, Lawn & Garden, Companions before you worry about micro-spec wins.
Check price, status, battery, sensors, and capabilities before getting lost in minor spec rows.
Once you have a shortlist, hide shared rows. That turns the table from a spec dump into a real decision tool.
A dedicated cleaner versus a home assistant with cleaning features can reveal whether you really need a specialist or just broader household coverage. Compare around the same outcome, not the same marketing language.
Use a prebuilt pairing when blank-page friction is the problem. Open one, swap robots, and keep moving.
Price bracket check — Roomba Mini versus AquaSense X shows what the premium tier actually buys in navigation, maintenance, and smart-home polish.
Same-brand shortlist — 4NE-1 Mini versus 4NE-1 isolates whether the higher tier actually changes the ownership story.
Mobility platforms — CyberDog 2 versus D1 Pro is a fast way to compare payload, stability, and commercial ambition inside the quadruped category.
Home presence check — Miko Mini versus LOVOT reveals how much extra presence, hardware, and ecosystem you buy as companion robots move upmarket.
Turn comparison rows into an actual recommendation — not just more reading.
Not all spec deltas matter equally. Rank your buying criteria before crowning a winner.
The sticker price is only one row. Subscriptions, consumables, and service access often decide the real winner.
Subscriptions
Cloud AI and premium app tiers can make a cheaper robot more expensive over three years.
Consumables
Brushes, pads, filters, and bags flip the value story on high-frequency robots.
Energy & battery
Large batteries and frequent charging reveal everyday operating demands.
Repair & warranty
Local servicing and spare-parts access are the quietest but most important long-term costs.
Specs describe ideal conditions. Your rooms, pets, and Wi-Fi determine what actually performs.
Of 205 robots tracked, 141 are available now. For household tasks, getting a capable robot into daily use today usually beats waiting for incremental improvements. For research or early-adopter use, waiting can make sense if the next model changes the platform story.
If two robots are still neck-and-neck, use softer signals that affect ownership quality more than spec sheets admit.
Comparison FAQ
Short answers to the questions that usually show up once the shortlist is live and the tradeoffs feel real.