Comparison controls
Swap robots without losing the table. Green cells mark numeric leaders; text rows show the tradeoffs that need judgment.
Green cells flag numeric leaders, while AI, sensors, and capability rows keep the real buying tradeoffs visible.
Price
Weight
Battery Life
Max Speed
AI
Sensors
Connectivity
Status
Category
Capabilities
| Spec | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $20,000 USD | $7,999 USD | $1,700 USD | $24,950 USD |
| Height | 167cm | 76–170cm (2'6"–5'7", adjustable) | 7.98cm (3.14 in) | 141cm |
| Weight | 30kg | Not disclosed | 38.14 lbs (robot + dock combined) | 24.5kg |
| Battery Life | ~4 hours | Mains powered (600W, 120V)Not comparable for this robot | 6,400 mAh Li-ion; official FAQ says about 2h15+ vacuuming/mopping with the arm disabled, or about 2h10+ with the arm enabled while tidying 10 items (Mop Wash Frequency set to 15 minutes). | 2–5 hours |
| Charging Time | Not disclosed | N/A (plugged in)Not comparable for this robot | 2.5-hour fast chargingNot safely comparable as a typed unit | Not disclosed |
| Max Speed | ~4 mph | StationaryNot comparable for this robot | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| AI | 1X Embodied Intelligence | Weave AI (weekly model updates, learning from corrections) | StarSight Autonomous System 2.0 with AI object recognition | Open-source autonomy stack (ROS 2 + Python SDK) |
| Sensors | RGB Cameras, Depth Sensors, Tactile Skin, Microphone Array | Vision System, Proprioceptive Sensors | LiDAR (StarSight 2.0), 3D Structured Light, RGB Camera, Cliff Sensors, Wall Sensors | Intel D405 RGBD Camera (gripper), Intel D435if RGBD Camera (head), Wide-Angle RGB Camera (head), Navigation Laser (LiDAR), Microphone Array, High Accuracy Base IMU, ArUco Fingertip Markers |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | Wi-Fi 2.4GHz/5GHz, Ethernet | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth, Ethernet, USB |
| Voice Assistants | None | None | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri | None |
| Status | Pre-order | Available | Available | Active |
| Category | Humanoid | Home Assistants | Cleaning | Home Assistants |
| Manufacturer | 1X Technologies | Weave Robotics | Roborock | Hello Robot |
Capability matrix
Use this grid when the shortlist is already close and feature gaps become the real tiebreaker.
| Capability | NEO | Isaac 0 | Saros Z70 | Stretch 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 DOF total (2 base + lift + telescoping arm + 3-DOF wrist + gripper + 2-DOF head) | — | — | — | ✓ |
| 20 Degrees of Freedom | — | ✓ | — | — |
| 22,000 Pa HyperForce Suction | — | — | ✓ | — |
| 2kg Payload | — | — | — | ✓ |
| AI Object Recognition | — | — | ✓ | — |
| AdaptiLift Chassis | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Adaptive Learning | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Assistive Care | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Auto Dust Emptying | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Auto Mop Washing & Drying | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Autonomous Navigation | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Autonomous Operation (30-90 min/load) | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Continuous Learning | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Dexterous Teleop Kit (accessory) | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Dual Anti-Tangle Brushes | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Embodied AI Research Platform | — | — | — | ✓ |
| FlexiArm Riser Side Mopping | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Floor-to-Cabinet Reach | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Gentle Manipulation | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Household Chores | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Laundry Folding | — | ✓ | — | — |
| LiDAR Mapping & Navigation | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Mobile Manipulation | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Multi-functional Dock 4.0 | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Object Pickup up to 300 g (socks, sandals, crumpled tissues, towels; more items planned via OTA) | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Obstacle Relocation | — | — | ✓ | — |
| OmniGrip 5-Axis Mechanical Arm | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Open Source Software | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Pants and Towels | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Remote Teleoperation Assist | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Safe Human Interaction | ✓ | — | — | — |
| T-shirts, Long Sleeves, Sweaters | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Teleoperation (Web / Gamepad / Dexterous) | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Tidying Up | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Vacuuming and Mopping | — | — | ✓ | — |
Use this flow to get to a clean shortlist fast. The route works best as a dense research workbench, not a marketing page.
Start with robots that solve the same job. Use category anchors like Humanoid, Cleaning, Companions, Research before you worry about micro-spec wins.
Check price, status, battery, sensors, and capabilities before getting lost in minor spec rows.
Once you have a shortlist, hide shared rows. That turns the table from a spec dump into a real decision tool.
A dedicated cleaner versus a home assistant with cleaning features can reveal whether you really need a specialist or just broader household coverage. Compare around the same outcome, not the same marketing language.
Use a prebuilt pairing when blank-page friction is the problem. Open one, swap robots, and keep moving.
Price bracket check — N1 versus Bespoke AI Jet Bot Steam Ultra shows what the premium tier actually buys in navigation, maintenance, and smart-home polish.
Same-brand shortlist — MiPA versus 4NE-1 isolates whether the higher tier actually changes the ownership story.
Mobility platforms — Go2 versus NEURA Quadruped is a fast way to compare payload, stability, and commercial ambition inside the quadruped category.
Home presence check — StackChan versus LOVOT reveals how much extra presence, hardware, and ecosystem you buy as companion robots move upmarket.
Turn comparison rows into an actual recommendation — not just more reading.
Not all spec deltas matter equally. Rank your buying criteria before crowning a winner.
The sticker price is only one row. Subscriptions, consumables, and service access often decide the real winner.
Subscriptions
Cloud AI and premium app tiers can make a cheaper robot more expensive over three years.
Consumables
Brushes, pads, filters, and bags flip the value story on high-frequency robots.
Energy & battery
Large batteries and frequent charging reveal everyday operating demands.
Repair & warranty
Local servicing and spare-parts access are the quietest but most important long-term costs.
Specs describe ideal conditions. Your rooms, pets, and Wi-Fi determine what actually performs.
Of 376 robots tracked, 228 are available now. For household tasks, getting a capable robot into daily use today usually beats waiting for incremental improvements. For research or early-adopter use, waiting can make sense if the next model changes the platform story.
If two robots are still neck-and-neck, use softer signals that affect ownership quality more than spec sheets admit.
Comparison FAQ
Short answers to the questions that usually show up once the shortlist is live and the tradeoffs feel real.
