Compare workbench
Pick up to four robots. The best comparisons match job type, price band, or environment.
Current shortlist
Swap robots anytime. The table updates live.
ShareThe table expands across desktop, stays dense on mobile, and highlights the strongest numeric values so the real tradeoffs are easy to spot.
Capabilities
Capabilities
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,299 USD | $1,299 USD |
| Height | 7.98cm (3.14 in) | Not officially disclosed |
| Weight | 38.14 lbs (robot + dock combined) | Not officially disclosed |
| Battery Life | 6400 mAh Li-ion (runtime varies by mode) | 3+ hours (NeverStop Battery) |
| Charging Time | Not officially disclosed | Not officially disclosed |
| Max Speed | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| AI | StarSight Autonomous System 2.0 with AI object recognition | NeuroNav AI for real-time navigation and obstacle avoidance; onboard AI identifies stain type and selects cleaning method; UV + RGB camera stain verification after cleaning |
| Sensors | LiDAR (StarSight 2.0), 3D Structured Light, RGB Camera, Cliff Sensors, Wall Sensors | LiDAR, RGB Camera, UV Stain Detect Light, Cliff Sensors, Carpet Detection Sensor |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | Wi-Fi, SharkClean App (iOS / Android) |
| Voice Assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri | None |
| Status | Available | Available |
| Category | Cleaning | Cleaning |
| Manufacturer | Roborock | Shark |
Capability matrix
Use this grid when the shortlist is already close and feature gaps become the real tiebreaker.
| Capability | Saros Z70 | PowerDetect UV Reveal 2-In-1 |
|---|---|---|
| 175°F Hot-Air Mop Pad Drying | — | ✓ |
| 185°F Hot-Water Mop Pad Washing | — | ✓ |
| 22,000 Pa HyperForce Suction | ✓ | — |
| AI Object Recognition | ✓ | — |
| AdaptiLift Chassis | ✓ | — |
| Anti-Allergen Complete Seal (ASTM F1977, 0.3 µm) | — | ✓ |
| App-Free Operation via On-Device Buttons | — | ✓ |
| Auto Dust Emptying | ✓ | — |
| Auto Mop Washing & Drying | ✓ | — |
| Auto Water Refilling | — | ✓ |
| Bagless Self-Emptying Dock (washable bin, ~1 month capacity) | — | ✓ |
| Deodorizer Canister | — | ✓ |
| Dual Anti-Tangle Brushes | ✓ | — |
| Flat Vibrating Mop Pad with Edge Extension | — | ✓ |
| FlexiArm Riser Side Mopping | ✓ | — |
| HyperSonic Mopping (7× scrubbing power, 2× stain removal vs Dreame X40) | — | ✓ |
| LED Status Indicators (Purple = dirt detected, Blue = stain detected) | — | ✓ |
| LiDAR Mapping & Navigation | ✓ | — |
| Local On-Device Image Processing (no cloud data) | — | ✓ |
| Multi-functional Dock 4.0 | ✓ | — |
| NeverStuck Threshold-Lifting Technology | — | ✓ |
| Object Pickup (socks, shoes, small items) | ✓ | — |
| Obstacle Relocation | ✓ | — |
| OmniGrip 5-Axis Mechanical Arm | ✓ | — |
| Single Anti-Tangle Roller Brush | — | ✓ |
| Single-Floor Mapping | — | ✓ |
| Stain Verification After Cleaning | — | ✓ |
| TÜV-Certified Sanitization | — | ✓ |
| UV Stain Detect (invisible mess detection) | — | ✓ |
| Vacuuming and Mopping | ✓ | ✓ |
Use this flow to get to a clean shortlist fast. The route works best as a dense research workbench, not a marketing page.
Start with robots that solve the same job. Use category anchors like Humanoid, Cleaning, Lawn & Garden, Commercial before you worry about micro-spec wins.
Check price, status, battery, sensors, and capabilities before getting lost in minor spec rows.
Once you have a shortlist, hide shared rows. That turns the table from a spec dump into a real decision tool.
A dedicated cleaner versus a home assistant with cleaning features can reveal whether you really need a specialist or just broader household coverage. Compare around the same outcome, not the same marketing language.
Use a prebuilt pairing when blank-page friction is the problem. Open one, swap robots, and keep moving.
Price bracket check — Roomba Mini versus AquaSense X shows what the premium tier actually buys in navigation, maintenance, and smart-home polish.
Same-brand shortlist — 4NE-1 Mini versus 4NE-1 isolates whether the higher tier actually changes the ownership story.
Mobility platforms — CyberDog 2 versus D1 Pro is a fast way to compare payload, stability, and commercial ambition inside the quadruped category.
Home presence check — Miko Mini versus LOVOT reveals how much extra presence, hardware, and ecosystem you buy as companion robots move upmarket.
Turn comparison rows into an actual recommendation — not just more reading.
Not all spec deltas matter equally. Rank your buying criteria before crowning a winner.
The sticker price is only one row. Subscriptions, consumables, and service access often decide the real winner.
Subscriptions
Cloud AI and premium app tiers can make a cheaper robot more expensive over three years.
Consumables
Brushes, pads, filters, and bags flip the value story on high-frequency robots.
Energy & battery
Large batteries and frequent charging reveal everyday operating demands.
Repair & warranty
Local servicing and spare-parts access are the quietest but most important long-term costs.
Specs describe ideal conditions. Your rooms, pets, and Wi-Fi determine what actually performs.
Of 201 robots tracked, 138 are available now. For household tasks, getting a capable robot into daily use today usually beats waiting for incremental improvements. For research or early-adopter use, waiting can make sense if the next model changes the platform story.
If two robots are still neck-and-neck, use softer signals that affect ownership quality more than spec sheets admit.
Comparison FAQ
Short answers to the questions that usually show up once the shortlist is live and the tradeoffs feel real.
