Compare workbench
Pick up to four robots. The best comparisons match job type, price band, or environment — then let the table surface the real gaps.
The dense table below is live. Swap robots anytime without leaving the page.
Share this comparisonComparison workspace
The table expands across desktop, stays dense on mobile, and highlights the strongest numeric values so the real tradeoffs are easy to spot.
Capabilities
Capabilities
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | N/A | $2,999 USD |
| Height | 59mm | 12.6 in |
| Weight | 1.3kg | 34.8 lbs |
| Battery Life | Corded operation with up to 30 minutes of power-off suction retention | Up to 6 hours (floor cleaning), up to 12 hours (surface only) |
| Charging Time | N/A (corded operation) | 6.5 hours (wireless dock) |
| Max Speed | Not officially disclosed | Not officially disclosed |
| AI | Intelligent path planning with dynamic Z/N route matching, edge detection, obstacle-aware rerouting, and multi-mode cleaning control | PoolNavi AI-driven path planning with 360° AquaScan underwater LDS 3D mapping, adaptive debris detection, dynamic route optimization, and intelligent suction adjustment |
| Sensors | Collision sensors, Optocoupler sensors, Current sensors, Pressure sensors | Underwater LDS (360° AquaScan), Debris detection sensors, Obstacle avoidance sensors |
| Connectivity | App control, Wireless remote control | WiFi (via AquaSonar ultrasound relay), MOVAhome app |
| Voice Assistants | None | None |
| Status | Available | Available |
| Category | Cleaning | Cleaning |
| Manufacturer | MOVA | MOVA |
Capability matrix
Use this grid when the shortlist is already close and feature gaps become the real tiebreaker.
| Capability | N1 | Rover X10 |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 GPH suction | — | ✓ |
| 12-layer safety protection | ✓ | — |
| 15-language voice announcements | ✓ | — |
| 4 jet-drive motors (FloatDrive) | — | ✓ |
| 5L dual-layer filtration (3μm + 180μm) | — | ✓ |
| 6 cleaning modes | ✓ | — |
| 7-in-1 OMNI Clean (floor, walls, waterline, surface, corners, steps, shallow zones) | — | ✓ |
| 8,000Pa suction | ✓ | — |
| All pool types and materials | — | ✓ |
| App control | ✓ | — |
| Automatic Z or N path planning | ✓ | — |
| Built-in 120mL water tank | ✓ | — |
| Cordless robotic pool cleaning | — | ✓ |
| Dual-Wing Mist-Cleaning system | ✓ | — |
| EdgeDrive precision brushing for edges and corners | — | ✓ |
| Multi-surface cleaning for mirrors, glazed tile, shower glass, and cabinet glass | ✓ | — |
| Obstacle avoidance around handles and locks | ✓ | — |
| One-touch start | ✓ | — |
| Real-time app monitoring and control | — | ✓ |
| Smart surface parking (auto and custom modes) | — | ✓ |
| Underwater LDS 3D mapping (360° AquaScan) | — | ✓ |
| Up to 32 m² cleaning per fill | ✓ | — |
| Up to 5,400 sq ft coverage per cycle | — | ✓ |
| Window cleaning | ✓ | — |
| Wireless charging dock | — | ✓ |
| Wireless remote control | ✓ | — |
Use this flow to get to a clean shortlist fast. The route works best as a dense research workbench, not a marketing page.
Start with robots that solve the same job. Use category anchors like Humanoid, Cleaning, Commercial, Research before you worry about micro-spec wins.
Check price, status, battery, sensors, and capabilities before getting lost in minor spec rows.
Once you have a shortlist, hide shared rows. That turns the table from a spec dump into a real decision tool.
A dedicated cleaner versus a home assistant with cleaning features can reveal whether you really need a specialist or just broader household coverage. Compare around the same outcome, not the same marketing language.
Use a prebuilt pairing when blank-page friction is the problem. Open one, swap robots, and keep moving.
Price bracket check — Roomba Mini versus AquaSense X shows what the premium tier actually buys in navigation, maintenance, and smart-home polish.
Same-brand shortlist — 4NE-1 Mini versus 4NE-1 isolates whether the higher tier actually changes the ownership story.
Mobility platforms — CyberDog 2 versus D1 Pro is a fast way to compare payload, stability, and commercial ambition inside the quadruped category.
Home presence check — Miko Mini versus LOVOT reveals how much extra presence, hardware, and ecosystem you buy as companion robots move upmarket.
Turn comparison rows into an actual recommendation — not just more reading.
Not all spec deltas matter equally. Rank your buying criteria before crowning a winner.
The sticker price is only one row. Subscriptions, consumables, and service access often decide the real winner.
Subscriptions
Cloud AI and premium app tiers can make a cheaper robot more expensive over three years.
Consumables
Brushes, pads, filters, and bags flip the value story on high-frequency robots.
Energy & battery
Large batteries and frequent charging reveal everyday operating demands.
Repair & warranty
Local servicing and spare-parts access are the quietest but most important long-term costs.
Specs describe ideal conditions. Your rooms, pets, and Wi-Fi determine what actually performs.
Of 178 robots tracked, 128 are available now. For household tasks, getting a capable robot into daily use today usually beats waiting for incremental improvements. For research or early-adopter use, waiting can make sense if the next model changes the platform story.
If two robots are still neck-and-neck, use softer signals that affect ownership quality more than spec sheets admit.
Comparison FAQ
Short answers to the questions that usually show up once the shortlist is live and the tradeoffs feel real.