Compare workbench
Pick up to four robots. The best comparisons match job type, price band, or environment — then let the table surface the real gaps.
The dense table below is live. Swap robots anytime without leaving the page.
Share this comparisonComparison workspace
The table expands across desktop, stays dense on mobile, and highlights the strongest numeric values so the real tradeoffs are easy to spot.
Capabilities
Capabilities
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,499 USD | $1,299 USD |
| Height | 11.2" (285 mm) | 89.5mm (LiDAR retracted) / 111.5mm (LiDAR raised) |
| Weight | 22.9 lbs (10.5 kg) | Not officially disclosed |
| Battery Life | Up to 7 hours (surface cleaning), up to 5 hours (floor cleaning, ECO mode) | Not officially disclosed (6,400mAh battery) |
| Charging Time | Approximately 4.5 hours (65W fast charging) | Not officially disclosed |
| Max Speed | Not officially disclosed | Not officially disclosed |
| AI | SonicSense ultrasonic obstacle detection and avoidance, optimized S-shaped cleaning path planning, automatic zone adaptation for surface/floor/walls/waterline/platforms | AI SmartSight obstacle recognition (240+ objects), auto room-type detection for MopSwap pad selection, pet and pet-waste detection (99.9% claimed) |
| Sensors | 18 integrated sensors, 2 ultrasonic sensors, SonicSense obstacle avoidance | FlexScope retractable DToF LiDAR, AI SmartSight camera, Structured-light 3D scanner, LED fill light |
| Connectivity | 5 GHz Wi-Fi, 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Beatbot app (iOS, Android, Apple Watch) | WiFi, MOVAhome app |
| Voice Assistants | None | Hey, MOVA |
| Status | Available | Available |
| Category | Cleaning | Cleaning |
| Manufacturer | Beatbot | MOVA |
Capability matrix
Use this grid when the shortlist is already close and feature gaps become the real tiebreaker.
| Capability | Sora 70 | Mobius 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 12N downward mop pressure at 260 RPM | — | ✓ |
| 212°F (100°C) hot-water mop self-washing | — | ✓ |
| 30,000Pa suction with carpet pressure-retention baffle | — | ✓ |
| 6,800 GPH suction with 6L debris capacity | ✓ | — |
| 65W fast charging | ✓ | — |
| App control with remote navigation and one-tap retrieval | ✓ | — |
| Auto-empty (3.2L dust bag) | — | ✓ |
| Auto-refill and dual cleaning-solution tanks | — | ✓ |
| Cordless robotic pool cleaning | ✓ | — |
| Dual-group roller brush system (4 bottom brushes) | ✓ | — |
| Five cleaning modes (Water Surface, Floor, Pro, Standard, Eco) | ✓ | — |
| FlexScope retractable DToF LiDAR navigation | — | ✓ |
| Four-zone coverage: surface, walls, waterline, floor | ✓ | — |
| JetPulse twin-jet water surface skimming | ✓ | — |
| MaxiReach extending side brush with 10mm lift | — | ✓ |
| MopSwap™ automatic three-pad selection | — | ✓ |
| Multi-level mapping and virtual barriers | — | ✓ |
| Pet care mode with live video monitoring | — | ✓ |
| RoboSwing extending mop with 10.5mm lift | — | ✓ |
| Saltwater pool support (up to 5,000 ppm) | ✓ | — |
| Shallow-platform cleaning down to 8 inches (20 cm) | ✓ | — |
| Smart Water-Surface Parking for easy retrieval | ✓ | — |
| SonicSense ultrasonic obstacle avoidance | ✓ | — |
| StepMaster 2.0 retractable legs (up to 80mm threshold crossing) | — | ✓ |
| Triple anti-tangle mechanisms (brush, side brush, wheel) | — | ✓ |
| TroboWave DuoBrush dual-brush system | — | ✓ |
| UV sterilization and dust-bag drying | — | ✓ |
Use this flow to get to a clean shortlist fast. The route works best as a dense research workbench, not a marketing page.
Start with robots that solve the same job. Use category anchors like Humanoid, Cleaning, Research, Commercial before you worry about micro-spec wins.
Check price, status, battery, sensors, and capabilities before getting lost in minor spec rows.
Once you have a shortlist, hide shared rows. That turns the table from a spec dump into a real decision tool.
A dedicated cleaner versus a home assistant with cleaning features can reveal whether you really need a specialist or just broader household coverage. Compare around the same outcome, not the same marketing language.
Use a prebuilt pairing when blank-page friction is the problem. Open one, swap robots, and keep moving.
Price bracket check — Roomba Max 705 Vac versus AquaSense X shows what the premium tier actually buys in navigation, maintenance, and smart-home polish.
Same-brand shortlist — FX Aegis versus FF Futurist isolates whether the higher tier actually changes the ownership story.
Mobility platforms — CyberDog 2 versus D1 Pro is a fast way to compare payload, stability, and commercial ambition inside the quadruped category.
Home presence check — Miko Mini versus LOVOT reveals how much extra presence, hardware, and ecosystem you buy as companion robots move upmarket.
Turn comparison rows into an actual recommendation — not just more reading.
Not all spec deltas matter equally. Rank your buying criteria before crowning a winner.
The sticker price is only one row. Subscriptions, consumables, and service access often decide the real winner.
Subscriptions
Cloud AI and premium app tiers can make a cheaper robot more expensive over three years.
Consumables
Brushes, pads, filters, and bags flip the value story on high-frequency robots.
Energy & battery
Large batteries and frequent charging reveal everyday operating demands.
Repair & warranty
Local servicing and spare-parts access are the quietest but most important long-term costs.
Specs describe ideal conditions. Your rooms, pets, and Wi-Fi determine what actually performs.
Of 155 robots tracked, 115 are available now. For household tasks, getting a capable robot into daily use today usually beats waiting for incremental improvements. For research or early-adopter use, waiting can make sense if the next model changes the platform story.
If two robots are still neck-and-neck, use softer signals that affect ownership quality more than spec sheets admit.
Comparison FAQ
Short answers to the questions that usually show up once the shortlist is live and the tradeoffs feel real.